Looked like it uses 'SHA256' to me but that doesn't mean it does. It wouldn't be the first time I've seen hints in files and executables that things are going to be much harder to crack than they actually are; just to deter people from trying, to steer them down the wrong path. I have done the same myself.As far as I can tell/guess, the firmware is signed with SHA-256withRSA
What looks like a 256-bit signature may actually be a simple 32-bit checksum hiding amongst random data.
But any unknown algorithm remains a problem until its secrets are revealed. And I have no idea what it actually uses.
Statistics: Posted by hippy — Thu Aug 08, 2024 6:19 pm